Feedback to the previous 2 argument design paper's comments Essay

Feedback to the previous 2 argument design papers comments - analyse ExampleIn this argument paper, I used the necessary exhibit to support my position, but did not define utopianism. My choice of language did not clearly put my supported position, which was a considerable taint of my initial argument design paper. The paper was not argumentative, and I failed to use the necessary structure and set to make my writing an argumentative paper as I did not correctly highlight the concept, argument, say and conclusion. I used exceptionally good grammatical language though it had some minor errors in the paper, which could have been avoided by being keen.With the instructors comment, I was able to correct wrongly presented evidence. In my original argument design paper, I had stated that CCP required intensive and extensive ideological compute among the peasants which was not necessarily the truth as they needed to work on some sections of the bourgeoisie, the intellectuals, and upp er human body people. By highlighting that the paper failed to qualify as an ADP, I carefully restructured my paper and presentation of the evidence to finally save a persuasive argumentative paper. The teachers comments highlighted weaknesses in my paper, which helped me bring through break by going over the literature again making me understand some key concepts I had overlooked.I wrote a good argumentative paper with superb presentation of evidence but failed to write a satisfactory conclusion. I used outdated evidence, which is not acceptable, and the paper had some grammatical mistakes.With the teachers comments, I was able to correctly write some of the statements with all the necessary information that I had omitted. I reverse the grammatical mistakes and paraphrased some of the sentences to make them have more impact and meaning. I corrected the weaknesses in my conclusion that were occasioned by the wrong choice of words, tense and sentence structure and was able to wr ite a persuasive conclusion. I