Does technology ensure progress? Essay

In this essay I forget fence in that engineering does non ensure overture. The first main model that needs to be clarified is engine room. This make-up acknowledges the concept engineering as existence the application of science, especially to industrial or commercial objectives. The other primaeval concept make in this essay is defined as a steady improvement, as a society or civilization. I am arguing that the concept of engine room does not ensure the concept of progress because in that respect atomic number 18 received technologies that prolong appal society in diverse ways. Furthermore, not all technologies ensure progress.Scientists have created various technologies for various reasons. It is evident that not all of these technologies are for the steady improvement of a society or civilization, but rather for personal gain. If a certain technology was invented to give a farmer a greater homecoming of crop, but this particular technology leads to the death of an ecosystem, then it is not progress in the sense it brings steady improvement to a society or civilization because it destroys the delicate balance of life and its biodiversity. The loss of biodiversity will hurt civilization in the long run because the foundations of life depend on it.Some population may think that certain technologies are the remediate path for humanity, but certain technologies flowerpot manifest into things that hatful do not expect and hurt society by doing so. For instance, if scientists could predict that aliens would discover over the earth if they invented a spaceship that could reach them, even though the scientists had not planned on finding earth invaders surely they would have thought otherwise. This is an extreme example that has obviously not happened, but the produce of atomic energy is an example of technology thats intended subroutine of giving houses and industries power manifested itself into a bomb for the military. Some may argue that the atomic bomb ensured progress for the Americans and allied forces, so far surely the Japanese society where the bomb was dropped during the Second World fight did not find progress with this technology because it come outed many innocent people and destroyed infrastructure.Certain technologies are seriously destroying the natural world. Thisultimately does not lead to the improvement of a civilization, but rather is causing it harm. If technology keeps generating harmful gases and toxic chemicals which poisons the earth, then it is of no good to civilization because adult male need to earth to survive.Some readers might object to me answering that technology does not ensure progress. Perhaps they believe if it wasnt for technology humans may never have succeeded in being a dominant figure on earth and we would never have evolved passable to even ask the question in the first place. There are animals that are stronger, bigger, and faster then humans and external elements that can kill humans at ease, so by humans using technology to build defensive mechanisms or shelter for warmth it has ensured human extract in a world that can be unforgiving by natural things. If my concept of technology remained the same (the application of science, especially industrial or commercial), but the concept of progress changed to ( education or growth) then oneness could answer yes to the question does technology ensure progress.This is evident in the manufacturing sector of our society where technology has enabled humans to build factories and warehouses to ensure development and growth of economics. The same could be said by keeping the concept of technology constant, but changing the definition of progress to (movement, as towards a goal). Scientists movement to create technology can be do by achieving goals. For instance, a certain product has to be on the grocery store by a specific due date, otherwise the project will be terminated, so by scientists using techno logy and ensuring they get the crinkle done they have moved forward and reached a goal.It is apparent that there are particular technologies that can help humans build a better society by keeping us warm and ensuring feed to survive. However, certain technologies have manifested through the evolution of man that have emphatically uninsured the progress of humans because it has brought harm to civilization through remnant and death. Perhaps scientists and the general public need to think long and unverbalized about inventing certain technologies. This is all the more difficult because nobody can predict the future and certain technologies might seem like agreat idea at the time, but turn out to be a serious danger to all life on earth. This paper by no means is an indicator of which technologies are good for the approach of society, but hopefully it will open the dialog between people to ask the question which technology is ensuring progress?