Text Messaging Affects Language Skills English Language Essay

text editionbook Messaging Affects Language Skills English Language EssayIn new-made y ears, there has been an enormous increase in the relativity of using carrel ph match slights to communicate. Cell call backs induct father the fundamental components of family life, especi all(prenominal)y for most teenagers. air of unlimited texting plans offered by phone companies alike(p) Sprint, T-mobile and Verizon, texting is becoming hard to resist. IYO TXTng = Gd 4 or NME of Lang? (Text Message Dictionary) If you bottom of the inning non go turn out the previous sentence, then you ar most likely ar non aware of the spoken language of the text put across. Who are the originators of this language? The answer is most of the teenagers in the modern society. The transformation for the vague sentence above is In your opinion, is texting good for or the foeman of language? Text messaging has provided our society with a quick room through which to communicate. It has taken out the need for capitalization, punctuation and the use and companionship of sentence structure. However, this recent form of communication has become so undischarged that some educationists worry that it may be damaging teens literacy skills. Others, however, believe that teenagers are making their own language in the modern society and mark off no effect on their students language skills.I think that the one way text messaging affects language skills is that it leads to the downfall of communication. It aids the insufficiency of intellect and flow of logic that humans possess when communicating with an otherwise(prenominal) human being. When I was in a McDonalds gallus of days ago, I observed some involvement that disturbed me it also annoyed me a bit and this had to do with communication skills and texting. A table in a corner crosswise from when I and friend were seated, there were three young people, ages that I can guess to be around 16. They all(prenominal) ordered drinks and French heat and they all had cell phones held in their hands. Couples had ear buds in their ears and probably auditory sense to music that they enjoyed. They shake back and forth around in their sit to the beat when they were listening to their music and texting on their mobile phones. Every couple of seconds, one of them would eat fries and slurp his drink and they were all texting.They were plain texting each other from the snickering laugh and pokes I observed yet they were all sit right there at the same table. The thing that pissed me the most was that there was literally no verbal conversation other than a casual grunt. Their communication was done on their cell phone with no stage to daring conversation with their friends who were sitting next to each other.Are we losing our ability to truly communicate or, use voices? When you are sitting at the same same table why werent you talking? Texting is not talking. Most teenagers in this society dont talk to other people face to face. There is no verbal communication. It is hard to make sense of the language because there is no tone, no expression, no feeling, no body language and it is easy to text virtually some issues rather than talk face to face. It is also easy to apprehend into a conversation which is not unfeignedly there and make wrong conclusions, without fully understanding what is being communicated. I know people who not only freak out about having to give a public speech, but who worry about having a face-to-face conversation. Its a bit ridiculous.Texting lingo has already spread to speech, affectionate ne devilrking sites and other areas of composing. Shorthand phrases such as LOL and OMG original appeared in messaging forums and transferred smoothly into text lingo. The same thing is happening in reverse. This is not a complication when youre texting or emailing your friends, but young people dont understand that you cant write LOL into an email to your boss. As American Univer sity linguistics prof Naomi Baron states, So much of American society has become slapdash or laissez faire about the mechanics of writing (Hauck). I agree with her. bridle any popular forum and see for yourself what the bloodbath of spelling and grammar looks like. So when we are not forced to write out linguistic communication, the rules of our language arent enforced.late(a) research seems to support that texting has an adverse impact on peoples linguistic ability. force Cingle and S. Shyam Sundar conducted research at Penn State University. They published their research in the victor journal,New Media and Society.Both authors argued that the students who write in techspeak used shorthand phrases, homophones, crucial and nonessential letters to compose a text message. They thought that writing in techspeak would prevent souls ability to go from techspeak to normal rules of grammar. They did research to take a chance if text messaging affected students grammar skills. Based on their data from everywhere 500 students from middle school, they conclude there is evidence of a settle in grammar scores. Cingle gives reader personal example from his two younger nieces. He indicates that their text messages were incomprehensible and that he had ask them what they were trying to get out of that message. The message was incomprehensible because the use of shortcuts, he said (Cingle Sundar).Joan Lee did other study to find the impact of texting on language skills. She conducted her study for her know thesis in linguistics. Based on her data, her results proved that the students who texted more were less apply to new terminology. Her results also proved that students who read media were more open to expanding their vocabulary. Our assumption about texting is that it encourages unconstrained language, Lee argues, but the study put together this to be a myth. Lee argues that reading print media exposes people to mixture andcreativityin language that is not found in text messaging used among youth (Lee).I think persons vocabulary expands upon first using communication device due to some unique words used in texting. However, the terminology size levels off as the person knows most of the words that are unique to texting. After that, the person entrust use same group of vocabulary over and over again.Lastly, teenagers in this society dont know exactly what listening is. They may look like they are listening, but things are going in one ear and right out the other. College students who frequently text message during class have difficulty staying attentive to classroom lectures and consequently are at encounter of having poor results, according to a study by Fan-Yi Flora Wei, and his two colleagues Ken Wang and Michael Klaussner. They published their study in the journalCommunicationEducation. They concluded that most college students believe they are capable of performing multitasking behaviors, such as texting during their classroom learning, but research does not support that proposition (Wei).Do I think text messaging is a bad thing? No, of course not, it is a good thing and certainly has a browse in todays computer age society in a more different ways, it can even help to keep us dear and protect us but when do not use it properly, as it was meant to be used, it depletes our writing skills, cripples our communication skills, and has a negative impact on the other language skills as well. When we let computer age technology, texting become our obsession and allow it to take over our life to such an end that we lose all our other living and language skills it becomes as chancy as a gun in the wrong hands.